NEOLIBERALISM: BLUEPRINT FOR POST-COLONIAL PLUNDER
Neoliberalization can be distilled into eleven major stages imposed on a host country by and for a co-opted ruling class, typically a client (vassal) oligarchy or corrupted Potemkin democracy.
The first 'full spectrum' experiment in neoliberal democracy was post-Soviet Russia under President Boris Yeltsin's two terms 1991-1999. America and western allies were given carte blanche to redesign the entire Russian economy. The results were an object lesson in unfettered privatization of state resources at an unprecedented scale.
Selling mineral rights, land, public infrastructure and industrial companies to foreigners was supposed to increase efficiency, on the theory that foreign management would raise productivity, and thereby supposedly generate more foreign exchange for Russia. The same procedure has been imposed on dozens of countries all around the world.
Instead of enriching the domestic economy, however, the new managers bled the newly privatized enterprises and sent their takings abroad as U.S. and other Western buyers bought their ownership rights. Privatizing financial, real estate and other rent-yielding assets, “freeing” these rentier chokepoints from public regulation and even untaxing their income has become the capstone of a US-centered “rule of law” legitimizing rent seeking, sponsored by the US Agency for International Development (USAID), the World Bank and IMF.
The resulting dynamic has indebted foreign economies to US and Western European banks and bondholders in the absence of local public banks, leaving the host economies to collapse under a deepening financial and fiscal burden — which acts as a lever to force yet further privatizations, sell-offs and new indebtedness.
The neoliberalization policy can be distilled into eleven major stages, to be imposed on the host country by a co-opted ruling class - typically a client oligarchy or a corrupted Potemkin democracy.
(1) Privatization to remove assets from the public domain. Privatizing the banking and credit system is the key to transferring real estate, natural resources and basic infrastructure mainly to political insiders. These appropriators are expected to find their interest to lie in selling their shares to buyers in the United States and Western Europe, at prices that leave substantial leeway for capital gains.
(2) Privatization of basic public utilities, typically starting with the highly capital-intensive transportation and communications sector, whose services can be provided at inflated prices, including monopoly rents. Health care and education likewise can be privatized and monopolized. Political support for capturing public regulatory agencies can be gained by a symbiosis of the infrastructure privatizers with the financial sector by using mutually remunerative debt financing.
(3) Minimal regulation to protect labor and consumers and the environment, permitting creditors, landlords and employers to maximize rents and profits, and to transfer the proceeds abroad in capital flight to London, New York and Delaware, Cyprus and other tax havens.
(4) Dependency on US and European banks to create credit for domestic governments, banks and companies — credit that domestic central banks could create themselves — at a cost of foreign-exchange outflows of debt service and income in years to come.
(5) A debt burden, especially one denominated in foreign currencies (dollars, euros or other) for real estate, corporate and financial debt, whose burden grows proportionally with the local currency’s depreciation.
(6) Merely nominal taxes on real estate and other rent-yielding property, inverting the classical principle of progressive taxation falling mainly on land rent, natural resource rent and monopoly rent.
(7) A regressive flat income tax that falls on labour, increasing its cost and thus helping price it out of foreign markets and in time the home market, while favouring the rentier income and wealth of client oligarchies and their foreign investors.
(8) A real estate bubble raising access prices for housing and commercial space, and hence the economy’s cost structure but increasing the mortgage market for banks. This obliges the domestic economy to take on rising mortgage debt, raising the cost of living and doing business.
(9) De-industrialization, resulting from financialization, that is, from financial short-termism and privatization, regressive income and consumption taxes instead of taxes on economic rent, and high debt burdens (all of which raise the cost of living and doing business, thereby pricing domestic labor and industry out of world markets), euphemized as progress toward a post-industrial economy.
(10) Rising trade dependency resulting from de-industrialization and the tendency of monocultures to lack basic economic self-sufficiency, leading to structural balance-of-payments deficits. The resulting foreign debt causes deepening dependency on the IMF and foreign bondholders, which insist on yet more neoliberalization in a vicious economic circle.
(11) Capital flight and emigration of labour, especially skilled labour.
NEOLIBERALISM: BLUEPRINT FOR POST-COLONIAL PLUNDER
NATO – an anti-white and anti-family institution . . .
After the apocalypse of 1945, a number of global organizations have been formed with the aim of maintaining and expanding totalitarian liberalism. One of the earliest organizations formed for this purpose was the war alliance "North Atlantic Treaty Organization", or NATO, which can be seen as the military wing of globalism.
In addition to ensuring that Washington always has international support for its military campaigns, NATO as an institution is explicitly anti-white and explicitly dedicated to "racial justice" for racial aliens living in white countries. As early as 1999, NATO authored reports blaming nationalists for a number of modern problems and warning against the influence of nationalism.
In 2023, the war alliance held a summit at its headquarters in Brussels on race where the alliance's leaders pledged to fight "homogeneous attitudes" and to use NATO's "collective intelligence" for the purpose.
In fact, NATO is so dedicated to its anti-white agenda that it openly advocates that institutions must be reshaped to be "inclusive," in other words, restructured to be more anti-white, and consist of fewer white employees and executives.
https://nordfront.se/nato-en-antivit-och-familjefientlig-institution